ArticleBMC medical education2024
PlayDecide teamwork: a discussion game for junior doctors to explore workplace bullying and harassment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace bullying and harassment (WBH) in healthcare settings has been widely described in the literature, although a lack of consensus on the definition of behaviours constituting WBH makes findings difficult to interpret. The consequences for those experiencing WBH can be severe, including burnout, stress, and suicidal ideation, yet formal reporting rates are low, in part due to a lack of understanding of WBH and the support services designed to address it. Those who experience WBH are more likely to reproduce the behaviour, creating a self-perpetuating cycle. There is an urgent need to develop educational tools to help trainees identify behaviours that can constitute WBH, and the support services available to address this issue.
methodsThe study setting was four acute hospital sites in Ireland; participants were interns (junior doctors in their first postgraduate year). A card-based discussion game, PlayDecide: Teamwork was developed with a multidisciplinary team (MDT), piloted, and implemented. Feedback was obtained from participants on the acceptability and educational value of the game via an anonymous online survey. The intervention is presented using the TIDieR framework. Data were analysed and presented using descriptive statistics.
resultsIntern trainers and facilitators expressed satisfaction with the game. Intern attendance at the PlayDecide sessions was estimated at 63.64% (n = 70), with a 57.14% response rate to the survey (n = 40). The majority of interns found the game acceptable, the cards realistic and relevant, and agreed that it was a safe space to discuss workplace issues. Most interns agreed that the learning objectives had been met, although fewer agreed that they had learned about support services.
conclusionPlayDecide: Teamwork is to the best of our knowledge the first intervention of its kind aimed at addressing WBH, and the first aimed at interns. We have shown it to be effective and acceptable to interns and intern trainers in the acute hospital setting. We hypothesised that strong group identification facilitated the discussion, and further, that the cards created cognitive distance, allowing for free discussion of the issues depicted without needing to divulge personal experiences. Further evaluation at behavioural and organisational levels is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.