SynthesisBMC medical education2024
Efficacy of typodont and simulation training in orthodontic education: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A web-based augmented reality system for orthodontic biomechanics: perceived usability and acceptability among dental students.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Beyond the typodont: deliberate practice, experiential learning, and feedback in postgraduate orthodontic education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating a preclinical orthodontic training using haptic-enhanced VR simulation system: a longitudinal study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of perceptions and evaluations of Simodont® Dental Trainer: a decade of virtual simulation.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of analogue and virtual typodont/simulation training in orthodontic education, focusing on its impact on clinical skills, motivation, and communication (PROSPERO ID# CRD42024560497). A comprehensive search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ERIC, and CINAHL identified 11 studies that examined various simulation-based learning approaches. The findings indicate that simulation-based training enhances short-term diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and practical skills in orthodontics, particularly in tasks such as bracket bonding and clinical reasoning. Simulations also fostered student engagement and motivation, bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application. However, challenges such as variability in simulation technologies, technical issues with advanced tools like VR, and the perception of increased workload were identified. While most students reported high satisfaction, the heterogeneity among study designs and training objectives limits generalizability. This review highlights the potential of simulation-based learning to enhance clinical preparedness in orthodontics and recommends further research to explore strategies for standardizing simulation tools, sustaining motivation, and evaluating long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.