Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695540›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using an electronic health record‒based clinical prediction model: clinical pilot implementation initiative.

Randall W Grout, Mohammad Ateya, Baely DiRenzo, Sara Hart, Chase King, Joshua Rajkumar, Susan Sporrer, Asad Torabi, Todd A Walroth, Richard J Kovacs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Randall W GroutIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. rgrout@iu.edu.
Mohammad AteyaPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Baely DiRenzoEskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sara HartPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Chase KingIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Joshua RajkumarFranciscan Physician Network - Indiana Heart Physicians, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan SporrerPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Asad TorabiIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Todd A WalrothEskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Richard J KovacsIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke, and early AF diagnosis may reduce associated morbidity and mortality. A 10-variable predictive model (UNAFIED) was previously developed to estimate patients' 2-year AF risk. This study evaluated a clinical workflow incorporating UNAFIED for screening, education, and follow-up evaluation of patients visiting a cardiology clinic who may be at an elevated risk of developing AF within 2 years.

methodsPatients were included if they were aged ≥ 40 years with a scheduled in-person visit at the Eskenazi Health Cardiology Clinic between October 25, 2021, and August 10, 2022. Clinical decision support identified patients with an elevated AF risk. Initial screening with 1-lead electrocardiogram devices was offered, and routine clinical practice for diagnosis and management was followed. Physicians were surveyed on their use of the workflow, attitudes toward implementation, and perceived impact on patient care.

resultsA total of 2827 patients had a clinic visit during the study period, of whom 1395 were eligible to be screened because they were classified as "elevated risk" by the UNAFIED predictive model. AF or atrial flutter diagnosis was newly documented for 29 patients during the study period. Of the newly diagnosed patients, 13 began anticoagulant therapy to mitigate stroke risk. Physicians (n = 13) who used the workflow most clinic days were more likely to indicate that it was easy to use, was not time-consuming, and improved patient care compared with physicians who only used the workflow occasionally.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to demonstrate clinical application of an electronic health record-based AF predictive model. The newly documented diagnoses, however, did not solely result from implementation of UNAFIED. This non-invasive, inexpensive approach could be adopted by other sites wishing to proactively screen patients at elevated risk for AF. Other sites should verify the model's performance in their own settings and ensure compliance with evolving regulatory requirements where applicable.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationElectronic Health RecordsAdultAgedDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentWorkflowAtrial fibrillationElectronic health recordsPredictive modelsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39695540
PMCPMC11657685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.