ArticleBMC oral health2024
Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Influence of chemical conditioning and micromechanical roughening on bond strength to zirconia ceramic.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of translucent zirconia overlay restoration with different preparation designs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bonded substrate, zirconia surface conditioning and the interaction between them on the shear bond strength of monolithic zirconia.
methodsForty-eight monolithic zirconia discs were CAD-CAM fabricated and divided into two groups according to surface treatment either as milled and universal primer application (Monobond N, Ivoclar-Vivadent) (P) or sandblasting then universal primer application (Monobond N) (SP). Each main group was further divided into three test groups according to the bonded substrate: dentin (DSP, DP), composite (CSP, CP) or resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) (GSP, GP). Adhesive resin cement (Multilinik automix, Ivoclar-Vivadent) was used for bonding. Specimens were stored in water bath for six months before thermal cycling for 10,000 cycles to mimic intra oral condition. All specimens underwent shear bond strength test (SBS) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Post Hoc tests were used for statistical analyses.
resultsThe means ± SD SBS of all test groups were recorded in (MPa). DSP group showed the highest mean SBS (22.65 ± 2.0) followed by DP group (18.61 ± 2.55). Meanwhile, GSP and GP groups showed the lowest mean SBS (4.77 ± 0.09, 4.57 ± 0.73 respectively).
conclusionSandblasting with priming is recommended as a monolithic zirconia surface treatment method. Dentin is the most reliable substrate followed by composite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.