Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695515›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

I-RANT: Training session on a novel, scripted, bystander microaggression intervention tool for medical students.

Emily Grass, Caroline Astemborski, James M Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily GrassDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA. emilyegrass@gmail.com.
Caroline AstemborskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.
James M Lewis, 1926 Alcoa Hwy., Suite 330, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroaggressions, subtle and often unintentional acts of hostility, have been recognized as a significant issue in healthcare, adversely affecting learners' emotional and physical well-being. Current strategies for addressing microaggressions are broad frameworks without empirical substantiation that leave learners without a clear direction for intervention. This study introduces a novel scripted, succinct, bystander intervention tool to combat microaggressions. The intervention tool developed by the research team, named I-RANT, follows the script of introduction, role naming, affirming the target, negating the microaggression, and transitioning within patient encounters. The study goal was to assess the ability of a training session to impact learners' recognition of microaggressions, confidence in intervening, and competency in applying the I-RANT tool.

methodsA pre-experimental study was conducted with 97 second-year medical students at a large academic center in the Southeast United States. The I-RANT tool was taught through a 90-minute training session. The session included an introduction lecture, small group discussions, and role-play scenarios. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed microaggression recognition via a multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) and self-reported confidence in intervening on a Likert scale. Differences were compared via paired T-test. Role-play scenarios were observed by trained faculty and graded for competence using a rubric.

resultsParticipants showed significant improvement in microaggression identification with increase in MCQ score from 4.17 (SD 0.75) pre-intervention to 4.74 (SD 0.42) post-intervention (p < .001) and increased self-reported confidence from 3.2 (SD 1.0) to 4.2 (SD 0.63) (p < .001). Trained faculty evaluated a random sampling of students' role-play scenarios (n = 30) revealing that 97% of sampled students demonstrated competence in utilizing the I-RANT tool. DISCUSSION: The I-RANT training session empowered learners to address microaggressions. Learners demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in recognition of microaggressions and confidence in intervening. The majority of learners demonstrated competency in utilizing the I-RANT tool by the end of the training session.

conclusionsThis study supports the effectiveness of our training session in enhancing medical students' ability to recognize and address microaggressions. I-RANT empowers learners with a tool to intervene against microaggressions within patient encounters.

Indexed as

AggressionStudents, MedicalAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHostilityHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdiversitymedical educationmedical schoolmicroaggressionstraining

Identifiers

PMID39695515
PMCPMC11657221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.