SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024
Prevalence and pathogen profiles of bacteremia in neonates hospitalized for clinical Sepsis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergence of extensively and pan-drug resistance in clinical bacterial isolates: A systematic scoping review from Ethiopian public health perspective.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacteremia is prevalent in neonates, largely attributed to factors inherent in the neonatal period. However, the prevalence of proven bacteremia in Ethiopian neonates has not been previously synthesized. Accordingly, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the prevalence of bacteremia and pathogen profiles in neonates hospitalized for clinical sepsis in Ethiopia.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020. The literature search was conducted across five databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Research for Life spanning from January 2015 to July 2023. The search strategy used MeSH terms and involved screening titles and abstracts, reviewing full-text articles, and including only observational studies published in English within the specified timeframe. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by three experienced reviewers using a validated data collection tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment tool, respectively. The prevalence of neonatal bacteremia was determined through a random effects model, with heterogeneity among studies assessed using the Q statistic and the I
resultsA meta-analysis of nine studies revealed a bacteremia prevalence of 40.0% (95% CI: 34.0-46.0%). Subgroup analysis indicated variations in prevalence based on regions and study designs, with Oromia at 44.0% (95% CI: 28.0, 61.0%) and Amhara at 39.0% (95% CI: 27.0, 51.0%). Longitudinal studies exhibited a higher prevalence (47.0%, 95% CI: 27.0-68.0%) compared to cross-sectional designs (38.0%, 95% CI: 32.0-44.0%). Gram-negative bacteria were identified as the predominant etiological agents, representing 59.5% (95% CI: 56.8-62.3%) of cases. Among the bacterial species, Staphylococcus aureus emerged as the most prevalent (20.0%, 95% CI: 18.0%, 22.0%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae, each contributing to 17.0% (95% CI: 15.0%, 20.0%) of bacteremia cases.
conclusionThe study revealed a significant high prevalence of bacteremia, with differences noted across regions and study designs. Key pathogens identified were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and coagulase-negative staphylococci. It is advisable to implement surveillance systems, targeted prevention strategies, diagnostic stewardship, and further research on regional variations and bacterial profiles to effectively enhance the ominous future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.