ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a one-step fast multiplex RT-PCR coupled to lateral flow immunoassay.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lesionia: a digital data management system to enhance collaborative management of epidemiological and clinical data of cutaneous leishmaniases patients.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- A rapid and visual dual LAMP-LFD assay for on-site simultaneous detection of influenza A virus (H1N1) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 has put emphasis on pivotal needs for diagnosis and surveillance worldwide, with the subsequent shortage of diagnostic reagents and kits. Therefore, it has become strategic for the countries to access diagnostics, expand testing capacity, and develop their own diagnostic capabilities and alternative rapid accurate nucleic acid diagnostics that are at lower costs. Here, we propose a visual SARS-CoV-2 detection using a one-step fast multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) amplification coupled to lateral flow immunoassay detection on a PCRD device (Abingdon Health, UK).
methodsWe developed various simplex fast-PCRs for screening sets of primer pairs newly designed or selected from literature or from validated WHO diagnostics, targeting S, N, E, RdRp or ORF1ab genes. We retained primers showing specific and stable amplification to assess for their suitability for detection on PCRD. Thus, fast RT-PCR amplifications were performed using the retained primers. They were doubly labeled with Fam and Biotin or Dig and Biotin to allow visual detection of the labeled amplicons on the lateral flow immunoassay PCR Detection (PCRD) device, looking at lack of interaction of the labeled primers (or primer dimers) with the test-lines in negative or no RNA controls. We set up all the assays using RNAs isolated from patients' nasopharyngeal swabs. We used two simplex assays, targeting two different viral genomic regions (N and E) and showing specific detection on PCRD, to set up a one-step fast multiplex RT-PCR assay (where both differently labeled primer pairs were engaged) coupled to amplicons' detection on a PCRD device. We evaluated this novel assay on 50 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 50 SARS-CoV-2 negative samples and compared its performance to the results of the quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) assays used for diagnosing the patients, here considered as the standard tests.
resultsThe new assay achieved a sensitivity of 88% (44/50) and a specificity of 98% (49/50). All patients who presented Ct values lower than 33 were positive for our assay. Except for one patient, those with Ct values above 33 returned negative results.
conclusionOur results have brought proof of principle on the usefulness of the one-step fast multiplex RT- PCR assay coupled to PCRD as a new assay for specific, sensitive, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 without requiring costly laboratory equipment, and thus, at reduced costs in a format prone to be deployed when resources are limited. This assay offers a viable alternative for COVID-19 diagnosis or screening at points of need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.