ReviewBMC public health2024
Using qualitative systems mapping to analyze the linkages between the behavioral and social (BeSD) determinants of routine childhood immunization in LMICs.
Review in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Community engagement for vaccine delivery in low- and middle-income countries and humanitarian settings: A scoping umbrella review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- The role of indigenous knowledge and cultural dynamics in immunization uptake in Africa.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDesigning effective immunization programs requires a strong understanding of how the factors affecting vaccine uptake interplay. In this review, we analyze the relationships between the Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD) of routine immunization using qualitative systems mapping (QSM).
methodsIn this review, we analyzed 92 experimental and quasi-experimental impact evaluations (IEs) from 11 LMICs that were published between 2010 and 2020. Secondary literature on the study context or the intervention was also included. The WHO's behavioral and social determinants (BeSD) framework was used to code the determinants identified in these IEs, and their relationships were mapped using qualitative systems mapping. We computed the in-degree (influenced by other determinants) and out-degree scores (influencing other determinants) to assess the extent of the influence of the BeSD determinants on one another.
resultsThe results identified that knowledge regarding immunization, trust in the health system and quality of immunization services, and community engagement by the health workers was influenced by several other determinants and had a high in-degree score. Caregivers perceptions of quality of immunization services, health provider availability, religious leaders, community engagement by health workers, and physical accessibility had a high out-degree score. We also identified two feedback loops between health provider availability and physical accessibility, and trust and perceptions of immunization quality.
conclusionsQSM analysis shows that the determinants of immunization uptake were interlinked with each other in complex ways. Our research identified BeSD drivers that affected multiple factors and can be viewed as key leverage points. Programs for improving vaccination uptake need to account for the strong role that caregivers' experience of immunization services and their trust in the health system play in indirectly affecting immunization uptake. There is also a need to acknowledge that fear of vaccination is fear of the opportunity and monetary costs associated with vaccine side-effects. The results from this review can inform discussion and form the basis for context specific research on the factors affecting immunization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.