ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Auxiliary identification of depression patients using interpretable machine learning models based on heart rate variability: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Heart Rate Variability as an Instrument to Understand the Connection Between Psychologic and Psychiatric Conditions and the Heart.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Smart Devices and Multimodal Systems for Mental Health Monitoring: From Theory to Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Association Between Triglyceride-Glucose-Body Mass Index and Depression in Elderly Diabetic Individuals: A Population-Based Study.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based identification of anxiety symptoms in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a comparative study of six algorithms with SHAP analysis and nomogram development.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDepression has emerged as a global public health concern with high incidence and disability rates, which are timely imperative to identify and intervene in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to explore the association between heart rate variability (HRV) and depression, with the aim of establishing and validating machine learning models for the auxiliary diagnosis of depression.
methodsThe data of 465 outpatients from the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were selected for the study. The study population was then randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm models were used to construct risk prediction models in the training set, and the model performance was verified in the test set. The four models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve and the decision curve analysis (DCA). Furthermore, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to illustrate the effects of the features attributed to the model.
resultsThere were 237 people in the depressed group and 228 in the non-depressed group. In the training set (n = 325) and test set (n = 140), the area under of the curve(AUC) values of the XGBoost model are 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.888,0.95] and 0.82 (95% CI 0.754,0.892)] respectively, which are higher than the other three models. The XGBoost model has excellent predictive efficacy and clinical utility. The SHAP method was ranked according to the importance of the degree of influence on the model, with age, heart rate, Standard deviation of the NN intervals (SDNN), two nonlinear parameters of HRV and sex considered to be the top 6 predictors.
conclusionWe provided a feasibility study of HRV as a potential biomarker for depression. The proposed model based on HRV provides clinicians with a quantitative auxiliary diagnostic tool, which is assist to improving the accuracy and efficiency of depression diagnosis, and can also be utilized for the monitoring and prevention of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.