ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Deep superpixel generation and clustering for weakly supervised segmentation of brain tumors in MR images.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glioma Segmentation on Multicenter 2D-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Rank Adaptation Tuning of a Foundation Model: An External Test Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Efficient Medical Image Segmentation in Multisensor Imaging: A Survey in the Era of Mamba and Foundation Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in MRI Brain Imaging: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generative AI for weakly supervised segmentation and downstream classification of brain tumors on MR images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraining machine learning models to segment tumors and other anomalies in medical images is an important step for developing diagnostic tools but generally requires manually annotated ground truth segmentations, which necessitates significant time and resources. We aim to develop a pipeline that can be trained using readily accessible binary image-level classification labels, to effectively segment regions of interest without requiring ground truth annotations.
methodsThis work proposes the use of a deep superpixel generation model and a deep superpixel clustering model trained simultaneously to output weakly supervised brain tumor segmentations. The superpixel generation model's output is selected and clustered together by the superpixel clustering model. Additionally, we train a classifier using binary image-level labels (i.e., labels indicating whether an image contains a tumor), which is used to guide the training by localizing undersegmented seeds as a loss term. The proposed simultaneous use of superpixel generation and clustering models, and the guided localization approach allow for the output weakly supervised tumor segmentations to capture contextual information that is propagated to both models during training, resulting in superpixels that specifically contour the tumors. We evaluate the performance of the pipeline using Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and compare the performance to state-of-the-art baselines. These baselines include the state-of-the-art weakly supervised segmentation method using both seeds and superpixels (CAM-S), and the Segment Anything Model (SAM).
resultsWe used 2D slices of magnetic resonance brain scans from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2020 dataset and labels indicating the presence of tumors to train and evaluate the pipeline. On an external test cohort from the BraTS 2023 dataset, our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.745 and a mean HD95 of 20.8, outperforming all baselines, including CAM-S and SAM, which resulted in mean Dice coefficients of 0.646 and 0.641, and mean HD95 of 21.2 and 27.3, respectively.
conclusionThe proposed combination of deep superpixel generation, deep superpixel clustering, and the incorporation of undersegmented seeds as a loss term improves weakly supervised segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.