Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695438›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Deep superpixel generation and clustering for weakly supervised segmentation of brain tumors in MR images.

Jay J Yoo, Khashayar Namdar, Farzad Khalvati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jay J YooInstitute of Medical Science, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada.
Khashayar NamdarInstitute of Medical Science, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiInstitute of Medical Science, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada. farzad.khalvati@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraining machine learning models to segment tumors and other anomalies in medical images is an important step for developing diagnostic tools but generally requires manually annotated ground truth segmentations, which necessitates significant time and resources. We aim to develop a pipeline that can be trained using readily accessible binary image-level classification labels, to effectively segment regions of interest without requiring ground truth annotations.

methodsThis work proposes the use of a deep superpixel generation model and a deep superpixel clustering model trained simultaneously to output weakly supervised brain tumor segmentations. The superpixel generation model's output is selected and clustered together by the superpixel clustering model. Additionally, we train a classifier using binary image-level labels (i.e., labels indicating whether an image contains a tumor), which is used to guide the training by localizing undersegmented seeds as a loss term. The proposed simultaneous use of superpixel generation and clustering models, and the guided localization approach allow for the output weakly supervised tumor segmentations to capture contextual information that is propagated to both models during training, resulting in superpixels that specifically contour the tumors. We evaluate the performance of the pipeline using Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and compare the performance to state-of-the-art baselines. These baselines include the state-of-the-art weakly supervised segmentation method using both seeds and superpixels (CAM-S), and the Segment Anything Model (SAM).

resultsWe used 2D slices of magnetic resonance brain scans from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2020 dataset and labels indicating the presence of tumors to train and evaluate the pipeline. On an external test cohort from the BraTS 2023 dataset, our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.745 and a mean HD95 of 20.8, outperforming all baselines, including CAM-S and SAM, which resulted in mean Dice coefficients of 0.646 and 0.641, and mean HD95 of 21.2 and 27.3, respectively.

conclusionThe proposed combination of deep superpixel generation, deep superpixel clustering, and the incorporation of undersegmented seeds as a loss term improves weakly supervised segmentation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingCluster AnalysisDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningConvolutional neural networksGliomaImage segmentationMagnetic resonance imagingSuperpixelsWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39695438
PMCPMC11657002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.