ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
HIV prevention and treatment cascades among female sex workers in Ghana: gaps and priorities that should be addressed by the national programme.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and determinants of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and liver injury among people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in the Upper East Region of Ghana.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently limited knowledge about HIV prevention and treatment cascades among female sex workers (FSW) in Ghana. This study sought to use the 2020 bio-behavioural survey (BBS) among FSWs to identify gaps and priorities in HIV treatment and prevention cascades to help achieve the 95-95-95 fast track targets.
methodThe study used a cross-sectional design with Time Location Sampling (TLS) technique in all regions of Ghana. All eligible FSW at the selected venues and stipulated time frame were interviewed and tested for HIV onsite using the national testing algorithm. For condom use and HIV testing cascades, each step of the cascade was calculated as a percentage of all FSW. Analysis of treatment cascade was restricted to HIV positive participants and was presented using both conditional (% eligible PLHIV) and unconditional (% all PLHIV) approaches. Viral suppression level was defined as < 1000 copies/ml.
resultsA total of 6,773 participants took part in the behavioral interviews while 6,217 took part in the biological component which involves HIV testing. In all, 33% and 80% of all FSW do not consistently use condoms with their paying clients and non-paying partners respectively. The findings further show that 26.6% of FSW have never tested for HIV, and contrary to the HIV testing policy of every six months for FSW, 70.0% did not test for HIV 6 months preceding the survey and 40.7% of all FSW did not test for HIV 12 months preceding the survey. The conditional treatment cascade was 32%-71%-57% while the unconditional cascade was 32%-23%-49%. The study further shows 68% of the HIV positive FSW were not aware of their HIV positive status, 77% were not on treatment, while nearly 51% were not virally suppressed regardless of treatment status.
conclusionThe results show that both the prevention and treatment cascades are suboptimal. Key gaps identified include low: HIV testing, viral load suppression, condom use with both paying clients and non-paying partners. There is therefore the need to scale prevention and treatment interventions particularly HIV testing, treatment initiation, consistent condoms use with both paying clients and non-paying partners to help achieve the 95-95-95 fast track targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.