ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
Evaluation of droperidol use in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of QTc prolongation and adverse events.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexamethasone Alone versus Combined with Droperidol for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Day Surgery Under Ciprofol-Alfentanil Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- QT Prolongation, Ventricular Arrhythmia, and Cardiac Arrest Signals During Ceftriaxone Co-therapy with Individual Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Multidatabase Study.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDroperidol is a first-generation antipsychotic medication that has been used for various indications in the emergency department (ED); however, its use has been controversial due to reports of QT prolongation and the risk of torsades de pointes (TdP). The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety of droperidol administration in the ED.
methodsThis was a retrospective study, conducted at an academic level I trauma center. System-generated reports were used to identify all droperidol administrations in the ED from the time that droperidol was reintroduced to the institutional formulary on July 1, 2019 through January 31, 2023. The major safety endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc interval prolongation, incidence of TdP, ventricular arrhythmia, or hypotension.
resultsA total of 327 administrations of droperidol were identified in 245 patients in the ED. The composite safety endpoint occurred in 30 (9.1%) administrations. None of these events were classified as "probable" or "definite" on the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. No episodes of TdP or serious ventricular arrhythmia were reported. Higher cumulative droperidol dose and creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min were associated with an increased odds of developing QTc prolongation (OR 1.27 [CI 1.04-1.56]) and (OR 1.01 [CI 1.0-1.02]), respectively.
conclusionsThe study supports the use of low dose droperidol for various indications in the ED. There were no serious adverse events reported that could be directly attributed to droperidol use; however, it is crucial to consider the potential dose dependent impact on QTc prolongation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.