ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
The role of CEUS in diagnosing tuberculous abscess of the right diaphragm.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting tuberculous diaphragmatic abscess (TDA) of the right diaphragm and provide a reference for its clinical diagnosis.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with right TDA confirmed via surgery and biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS and routine ultrasound for detecting right TDA was compared.
resultsAmong the 33 right TDA cases, the lesions primarily exhibited mixed and low echogenicity, with an orientation parallel to the diaphragmatic surface. Eighteen patients (54.5%) demonstrated the characteristic "crocodile mouth sign." Heterogeneous enhancement was observed in most cases (24 patients) compared to homogeneous or no enhancement. The diagnostic accuracy of routine ultrasound for right TDA was 54.50% (18/33), whereas CEUS demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy of 78.78% (26/33) (χ
conclusionCEUS provides valuable insights into the vascular characteristics of right TDA, with most cases showing mixed echogenicity and heterogeneous enhancement. The "crocodile mouth sign" was a distinctive feature, highlighting the utility of CEUS in improving diagnostic accuracy for right TDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.