ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Predicting maternal risk level using machine learning models.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global prostate cancer risk associated with microplastic exposure: a statistical and machine learning analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Unveiling socio-demographic determinants of low birth weight using machine learning techniques.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of maternal postnatal care utilization in Bangladesh: A machine learning and SHAP-based analysis of BDHS 2022 data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence's Role in Improving Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Consideration of Ethical Issues.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prediction of high-risk pregnancy based on machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of an advanced maternal health risk detection system using enhanced XGBOOST and blending models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal morbidity and mortality remain critical health concerns globally. As a result, reducing the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is part of goal 3 in the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), and previously, it was an important indicator in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Therefore, identifying high-risk groups during pregnancy is crucial for decision-makers and medical practitioners to mitigate mortality and morbidity. However, the availability of accurate predictive models for maternal mortality and maternal health risks is challenging. Compared with traditional predictive models, machine learning algorithms have emerged as promising predictive modelling methods providing accurate predictive models.
methodsThis work aims to explore the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in maternal risk level prediction using a nationwide maternal mortality dataset from Oman for the first time. A total of 402 maternal deaths from 1991 to 2023 in Oman were included in this study. We utilised principal component analysis (PCA) in the ML algorithms and compared them to the results of model performance without PCA. We employed and compared ten ML algorithms, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (xgboost), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Different metrics, including, accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and the F1- score, were utilised to assess Model performance.
resultsThe results indicated that the RF model outperformed the other methods in predicting the risk level (low or high) with an accuracy of 75.2%, precision of 85.7% and F1- score of 73% after PCA was applied.
conclusionsWe applied several machine learning models to predict maternal risk levels for the first time using real data from Oman. RF outperformed the other algorithms in this classification problem. A reliable estimate of maternal risk level would facilitate intervention plans for medical practitioners to reduce maternal death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.