ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Low-cost and label-free blue light cystoscopy through digital staining of white light cystoscopy videos.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Fluorescence Guidance in Urologic Oncology: Current Status, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Contemporary Role for Blue Light Cystoscopy Across the Bladder Cancer Disease Spectrum.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Autofluorescence and deep learning in early disease detection: biological foundations, clinical applications, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Low-cost and label-free blue light cystoscopy through digital staining of white light cystoscopy videos.Communications medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer is the 10
methodsHere, we report the first demonstration of digital staining as a promising strategy to convert WLC images collected with standard-of-care clinical equipment into accurate BLC-like images, providing enhanced sensitivity for WLC without the associated labor or equipment cost.
resultsBy introducing key pre-processing steps to circumvent color and brightness variations in clinical datasets needed for successful model performance, the results achieve a staining accuracy of 80.58% and show excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement of the digitally stained WLC (dsWLC) images with ground truth BLC images, including color consistency.
conclusionsIn short, dsWLC can affordably provide the fluorescent contrast needed to improve the detection sensitivity of bladder cancer, thereby increasing the accessibility of BLC contrast for bladder cancer surveillance. The broader implications of this work suggest digital staining is a cost-effective alternative to contrast-based endoscopy for other clinical scenarios outside of urology that can democratize access to better healthcare.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.