ArticleScientific reports2024
Damage identification based on the inner product matrix and parallel convolution neural network for frame structure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural health monitoring based on vibration signal analysis has been extensively employed for damage identification. Mainstream machine learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), often rely on single-domain inputs, which may provide limited information for accurate damage identification. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a novel approach that combines an inner product matrix (IPM) with a parallel CNN (IPM-PCNN) to extract multidimensional features for detecting structural damage in a steel frame structure. The proposed IPM-PCNN framework consists of a one-dimensional (1D) CNN branch for processing time series data, a two-dimensional (2D) CNN branch for handling structural modal data, and several fully connected layers. This unique combination leverages the strengths of both 1D and 2D CNNs to capture temporal and modal features of the signal effectively. To validate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method, a five-story steel frame model is used as the research object, and five comparative methods are evaluated under the same experimental conditions. The results demonstrate that the IPM-PCNN model can automatically extract relevant features from the signals to accurately identify structural damage, achieving an accuracy of 96.60% on the test set, outperforming machine learning methods in performance. Furthermore, the internal inference processes of these methods are explored and visualized to provide insights into their decision-making mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.