ReviewScientific reports2024
Decoding skin cancer classification: perspectives, insights, and advances through researchers' lens.
Review in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical AI Incorporating Validation Strategies, Real-World Applicability, and Ethical Principles: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- PRISM: a clinically interpretable stepwise framework for multimodal skin cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CBAM-Xception: An Attention-Guided Framework for Skin Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Smart medical system integrating clinical workflows for robust skin cancer detection across heterogeneous pathologies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exosome-based strategies and immunotherapy for skin cancer: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Revealing key biomarkers and molecular mechanisms associated with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in skin cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal fusion for skin lesion classification using dermoscopic images and patient metadata.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Engineering spherical nucleic acids for precision cancer therapy: design strategies and medical applications.Theranostics · 2026Review
- From Prompts to Practice: Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok Against Plastic Surgeons in Local Flap Decision-Making.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is a significant global health concern, with timely and accurate diagnosis playing a critical role in improving patient outcomes. In recent years, computer-aided diagnosis systems have emerged as powerful tools for automated skin cancer classification, revolutionizing the field of dermatology. This survey analyzes 107 research papers published over the last 18 years, providing a thorough evaluation of advancements in classification techniques, with a focus on the growing integration of computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reliability. The paper begins by presenting an overview of the fundamental concepts of skin cancer, addressing underlying challenges in accurate classification, and highlighting the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods. Extensive examination is devoted to a range of datasets, including the HAM10000 and the ISIC archive, among others, commonly employed by researchers. The exploration then delves into machine learning techniques coupled with handcrafted features, emphasizing their inherent limitations. Subsequent sections provide a comprehensive investigation into deep learning-based approaches, encompassing convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, attention mechanisms, ensemble techniques, generative adversarial networks, vision transformers, and segmentation-guided classification strategies, detailing various architectures, tailored for skin lesion analysis. The survey also sheds light on the various hybrid and multimodal techniques employed for classification. By critically analyzing each approach and highlighting its limitations, this survey provides researchers with valuable insights into the latest advancements, trends, and gaps in skin cancer classification. Moreover, it offers clinicians practical knowledge on the integration of AI tools to enhance diagnostic decision-making processes. This comprehensive analysis aims to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, serving as a guide for the AI community to further advance the state-of-the-art in skin cancer classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.