Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695157›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2024

Decoding skin cancer classification: perspectives, insights, and advances through researchers' lens.

Amartya Ray, Sujan Sarkar, Friedhelm Schwenker, Ram Sarkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amartya Ray *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Sujan Sarkar *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Friedhelm SchwenkerInstitute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, 89081, Ulm, Germany. friedhelm.schwenker@uni-ulm.de.
Ram SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is a significant global health concern, with timely and accurate diagnosis playing a critical role in improving patient outcomes. In recent years, computer-aided diagnosis systems have emerged as powerful tools for automated skin cancer classification, revolutionizing the field of dermatology. This survey analyzes 107 research papers published over the last 18 years, providing a thorough evaluation of advancements in classification techniques, with a focus on the growing integration of computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reliability. The paper begins by presenting an overview of the fundamental concepts of skin cancer, addressing underlying challenges in accurate classification, and highlighting the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods. Extensive examination is devoted to a range of datasets, including the HAM10000 and the ISIC archive, among others, commonly employed by researchers. The exploration then delves into machine learning techniques coupled with handcrafted features, emphasizing their inherent limitations. Subsequent sections provide a comprehensive investigation into deep learning-based approaches, encompassing convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, attention mechanisms, ensemble techniques, generative adversarial networks, vision transformers, and segmentation-guided classification strategies, detailing various architectures, tailored for skin lesion analysis. The survey also sheds light on the various hybrid and multimodal techniques employed for classification. By critically analyzing each approach and highlighting its limitations, this survey provides researchers with valuable insights into the latest advancements, trends, and gaps in skin cancer classification. Moreover, it offers clinicians practical knowledge on the integration of AI tools to enhance diagnostic decision-making processes. This comprehensive analysis aims to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, serving as a guide for the AI community to further advance the state-of-the-art in skin cancer classification systems.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerDeep learningMachine learningMedical imageSkin cancerSkin lesion classification

Identifiers

PMID39695157
PMCPMC11655883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.