ArticleTranslational psychiatry2024
Prefrontal cortex stimulation normalizes deficient adaptive learning from outcome contingencies in low mood.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anhedonia and Anxious Arousal Are Associated With Distinct Expectations About the Statistics of a Volatile Environment.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression and anxiety are associated with deficits in adjusting learning behaviour to changing outcome contingencies. This is likely to drive and maintain symptoms, for instance, by perpetuating negative biases or a sense of uncontrollability. Normalising such deficits in adaptive learning might therefore be a novel treatment target for affective disorders. The aim of this experimental medicine study was to test whether prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could normalise these aberrant learning processes in depressed mood. To test proof-of-concept, we combined tDCS with a decision-making paradigm that manipulates the volatility of reward and punishment associations. 85 participants with low mood received tDCS during (or before) the task. In two sessions participants received real or sham tDCS in counter-balanced order. Compared to healthy controls (n = 40), individuals with low mood showed significantly impaired adjustment of learning rates to the volatility of loss outcomes. Prefrontal tDCS applied during task performance normalised this deficit, by increasing the adjustment of loss learning rates. As predicted, prefrontal tDCS before task performance (control) had no effect. Thus, the effect was cognitive-state dependent. Our study shows, for the first time, that a candidate depression treatment, prefrontal tDCS, when paired with a task, can reverse deficits in adaptive learning from outcome contingencies in low mood. Thus, combining neurostimulation with a concurrent cognitive manipulation is a potential novel strategy to enhance the effect of tDCS in depression treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.