ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Understanding the implication of task conditions on asymmetry in gait of post-stroke individuals using an Integrated Wearable System.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reproducible candidate kinematic-electromyographic waveform markers of post-stroke gait from public multimodal waveform exports.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemiplegic individuals often demonstrate gait abnormality causing asymmetry in lower-limb muscle activation-related (implicit) and gait-related (explicit) measures (offering complementary information on one's gait) while walking. Added to hemiplegia, such asymmetry can be aggravated while walking under varying task conditions, namely, walking without speaking (single task), walking while counting backwards (dual task), and walking while holding an object and counting backwards (multiple task). This emphasizes the need to quantify the extent of aggravated implication of multiple-task and dual-task on gait asymmetry compared to single task. Here, we used Integrated Wearable System and carried out a study with a group of age-matched hemiplegic (Grp_S) and healthy (Grp_H) individuals to understand the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in explicit and implicit measures of gait, implication of hemiplegic condition and varying task conditions on these asymmetry measures along with their clinical relevance. Results showed the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in both explicit and implicit measures of gait, and these measures were statistically higher (p-value < 0.05) in Grp_S than Grp_H irrespective of the task conditions. Also, for Grp_S, these asymmetry measures became more pronounced as task demand increased, and again, these measures have shown a correlation with their risk of fall specifically during more attention-demanding tasks that could be clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39695070What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.