ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Changes in Healthcare Professionals' Practice Behaviors Through an Educational Intervention Targeting Weight Bias.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Obesity Management Education for Healthcare Professionals: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- The burden of bias: Patient experiences and providers' perspectives on weight bias.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- How does the Calibre learning program impact attitudes towards caring for patients who have obesity?Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Misconceptions About Obesity and Weight Stigma in Brazilian Healthcare Professionals.Clinical obesity · 2026Article
- Addressing weight stigma and communicating with patients.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Review
- Evolution of multidisciplinary obesity treatments: past, present, and future role of nutrition.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Review
- Novel Strategies to Conquer Residual Adiposity Risk in Cardiovascular Disease.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Weight stigma and bias: standards of care in overweight and obesity-2025.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Review
- Tackling the complexity of obesity in the US through adaptation of public health strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWeight bias is pervasive in healthcare and leads to worse patient outcomes. A uniquely designed 4-h continuing medical education (CME) intervention was assessed for changing healthcare professionals' (HCPs') weight biases and clinical practice behaviors.
designThe intervention used a (1) pre/post design examining CME attendees' self-reported weight bias at baseline, after, and 4- and 12-month follow-up, and (2) post/post design examining obesity practice behaviors 12 months after intervention in attendees and non-attendees.
settingSingle medical center service area within Kaiser Permanente Southern California.
participantsAll HCPs (n = 472) from the target service area were eligible to attend. Analyses were done with 218 HCPs who attended and 89 who did not. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention contained theory-based elements of changing attributions of responsibility of obesity, increasing empathy, creating self-awareness of weight bias, and creating a bias-free culture. For pre/post analyses, the primary outcome was self-reported weight bias. For comparative analyses of CME attendees and non-attendees, the outcomes were electronic medical record-confirmed rates of obesity diagnosis and referrals to evidence-based obesity treatments in the 12 months following the CME intervention.
resultsSelf-reported negative obesity stereotypes were significantly reduced compared to baseline while self-reported empathy and confidence in caring for patients with obesity were significantly increased immediately post intervention and were maintained at 4- and 12-month follow-up. After adjusting for years in practice, race/ethnicity, gender, profession type, practice type, and panel size, HCPs who attended the CME intervention had significantly increased odds (range 60-212%) of diagnosis and obesity-related referrals in the 12 months following the CME intervention when compared to HCPs who did not attend. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This intervention has promise to be a scalable program that goes beyond impacting HCP's self-reported weight bias and also changes HCPs' clinical practice behaviors related to obesity treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.