Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2025

Quantitative Measurement of Individual and Contextual Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination in General Population Samples: A Scoping Review.

Chelsea Moran, Sydney Seidel, Shokouh Abolhosseini, Adina Coroiu, Roshni Sohail, Jessame Gamboa, Anthony B Valdarchi, Laura Hernandez, Tavis S Campbell

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chelsea MoranDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4W7, Canada. chmoran@ottawaheart.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-0415
Sydney SeidelDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Shokouh AbolhosseiniDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Adina Coroiu, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Roshni SohailDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, 550 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Jessame GamboaDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Anthony B ValdarchiDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Laura HernandezDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Tavis S CampbellDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MM1- 174902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis scoping review aims to map the quantitative literature investigating vaccine-related individual and contextual determinants of COVID-19 vaccination uptake, identify and define constructs assessed, and describe the characteristics of self-report measures.

methodsA systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to capture peer-reviewed journal articles published between December 31, 2019, and December 25, 2021. Studies conducted in English and collecting data from general population samples using self-report measures of vaccine-related determinants of COVID-19 vaccination behavior were eligible. Data were analyzed using a descriptive statistics and content analysis, and constructs were mapped onto the COM-B model. The review pre-registration is available on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/82fsz ).

resultsThis review identified 157 studies (6153 abstracts and 997 full texts screened) and 425 vaccine-related constructs were retrieved from included studies. Of these, 4% were mapped to capability factors, 85% to motivation, and 11% to opportunity. The most frequently assessed constructs were positive attitudes (19% of constructs), negative attitudes (16%), intention (10%), and beliefs (8%). Only 11% of studies used or adapted pre-existing measures in their surveys. Psychometric properties of self-report measures used were not reported in the majority of studies (60%).

conclusionsFindings suggest a predominant focus on perceived individual-level predictors of COVID-19 vaccination with inconsistent measurement, potentially compromising research validity. This research highlights opportunities to explore social/environmental factors, establish unified definitions, and employ validated self-report measures for robust survey-based studies on COVID-19 vaccination determinants.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVaccinationHumansMotivationSARS-CoV-2Self ReportCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Immunization/immunisationMeasurementScoping reviewSelf-report measureVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39695051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.