ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Identification of gastric cancer subtypes based on disulfidptosis-related genes: GPC3 as a novel biomarker for prognosis prediction.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel immunotherapy for gastric cancer: targeting the CD47-SIRPα axis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer type. "Disulfidptosis," a distinct form of cell death, is initiated through aberrant intracellular disulfide metabolism. Here, we identified various GC subtypes based on disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) and constructed a risk score model to identify relevant genes to help predict patient prognosis and guide treatment. We downloaded RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from the TCGA-STAD database, performed a difference analysis, and combined the data with GSE84437 to successfully perform an unsupervised clustering analysis based on DRGs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Risk-scoring models were established by screening prognosis-related DEGs. The GC samples were segregated into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups according to their risk scores. We then evaluated the genes screened with the model in terms of prognosis, tumor, and immune cell infiltration. The response of patients with GC to immunological therapy was assessed using tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion scores. Using unsupervised cluster analysis, we identified two DRG clusters and two gene clusters that differed in prognosis and tumor microenvironment. A six-gene model was developed for risk score assessment. The LR group demonstrated superior performance compared to the HR group in terms of immunity, exhibiting greater sensitivity to immunotherapy. Thereafter, we selected the model gene GPC3 for single-gene analysis and verified it by experimental validation. The results demonstrated that GPC3 can serve as a standalone biomarker with promising clinical applicability in the prognostic prediction and clinical management of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.