ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Pan-cancer analysis reveals the prognostic and immunomodulatory potential of super-enhancer-induced ANGPT2 and experimental validation in colorectal cancer.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics and bulk sequencing analyses reveal the roles of prognosis and immune aspects of super-enhancer-induced ZBED2 in pan-cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Targeting super-enhancers in liver cancer: from pathogenic mechanisms to clinical applications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundANGPT2 plays important roles in cancer development. However, there is still no systematic analysis of ANGPT2 in pan-cancer.
methodsIn this paper, we conducted a pan-cancer analysis to investigate the characteristics of ANGPT2. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of genetic and epigenetic factors on ANGPT2 expression by bioinformatics and assays.
resultsBy several TCGA and GEO databases, we identified elevated expression of ANGPT2 in various tumor types. Besides, high expression of ANGPT2 induced poor prognosis of patients in multiple tumors. Through enrichment analysis, we found that ANGPT2 participated in various biological processes, including angiogenesis and immunity. Various immune analyses indicated that high expression of ANGPT2 might suggest a propensity towards a hot tumor microenvironment, but its impact on immunotherapy was negative. Bioinformatics analysis and experiments confirmed that genetic and epigenetic factors explained part of the mechanism behind ANGPT2 abnormal expression. Finally, we screened candidate drugs targeting the ANGPT2 protein by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation.
conclusionANGPT2 has diagnostic and prognostic values in multiple tumor types. Though with a hot tumor microenvironment, ANGPT2 high expression patients are not suitable for immunotherapy because of its proangiogenic function, contributing to selecting the exact patients for immunotherapy. Both genetic and epigenetic factors influenced ANGPT2 expression, with the influence of super-enhancer being more pronounced. This paper for the first time did the systematic analysis of ANGPT2 and showed its characteristic in pan-cancer. We summarized the biomarker role of ANGPT2 on tumor diagnosis and prognosis, as well as its target role on tumor immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39695006What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.