Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694988›Full record

ArticleOecologia2024

Pollen specialist bee species are accurately predicted from visitation, occurrence and phylogenetic data.

Colleen Smith, Nick Bachelder, Avery L Russell, Vanessa Morales, Abilene R Mosher, Katja C Seltmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging local species data, a global database, and an occupancy model to explore bee-plant interactions.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colleen SmithCheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration, University of California, Harder South Building 578, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-6927
Nick BachelderCheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration, University of California, Harder South Building 578, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Avery L RussellDepartment of Biology, Missouri State University, 910 S John Q Hammons Parkway, Temple Hall, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA.
Vanessa MoralesDepartment of Biology, Missouri State University, 910 S John Q Hammons Parkway, Temple Hall, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA.
Abilene R MosherDepartment of Biology, Missouri State University, 910 S John Q Hammons Parkway, Temple Hall, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA.
Katja C SeltmannCheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration, University of California, Harder South Building 578, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. seltmann@ucsb.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1924008National Science Foundation 1924205National Science Foundation DBI-2102006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An animal's diet breadth is a central aspect of its life history, yet the factors determining why some species have narrow dietary breadths (specialists) and others have broad dietary breadths (generalists) remain poorly understood. This challenge is pronounced in herbivorous insects due to incomplete host plant data across many taxa and regions. Here, we develop and validate machine learning models to predict pollen diet breadth in bees, using a bee phylogeny and occurrence data for 682 bee species native to the United States, aiming to better understand key drivers. We found that pollen specialist bees made an average of 72.9% of their visits to host plants and could be predicted with high accuracy (mean 94%). Our models predicted generalist bee species, which made up a minority of the species in our dataset, with lower accuracy (mean 70%). The models tested on spatially and phylogenetically blocked data revealed that the most informative predictors of diet breadth are plant phylogenetic diversity, bee species' geographic range, and regional abundance. Our findings also confirm that range size is predictive of diet breadth and that both male and female specialist bees mostly visit their host plants. Overall, our results suggest we can use visitation data to predict specialist bee species in regions and for taxonomic groups where diet breadth is unknown, though predicting generalists may be more challenging. These methods can thus enhance our understanding of plant-pollinator interactions, leading to improved conservation outcomes and a better understanding of the pollination services bees provide.

Indexed as

PhylogenyPollenPollinationAnimalsBeesDietBeeDiet breadthGeneralistInteractionsOligolectyPollen

Identifiers

PMID39694988
PMCPMC11655600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.