ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Exploring the "shared" in shared decision-making in the care for children with chronic diseases or disabilities: what are the roles of parents and professionals?
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared decision-making for pediatric acute otitis media in the United States: a randomized emergency department trial.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- Shared decision-making in pediatric physical therapy: A qualitative study among adolescents, parents, and physical therapists.PloS one · 2026Article
- Improving shared decision‑making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease, and their parents: an observational post-intervention study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of shared decision-making (SDM) in the care for children with chronic conditions and/or disabilities. Although participation in SDM can be more or less active, the tuning between parents and professionals about the way they want to participate in SDM is often an implicit process, limiting parents' optimal involvement. Role definitions may support both partners in the process of SDM. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the available knowledge on the interpretation and variability of different roles of parents and professionals in SDM. In total, 43 articles were included and were subjected to data extraction and thematic coding. The findings show that roles are described in the literature by three themes: (1) active and passive involvement, (2) leadership in decision-making, and (3) six specific roles: informing, advocating, supporting, facilitating, coordinating, and interacting. Some, but not all, of these roles are described for parents as well as professionals.Conclusion: The literature provides a first definition of the various roles parents and professionals may take during SDM. However, the results do not inform how the described roles can be performed in clinical practice. Follow-up research is needed to develop and evaluate practical initiatives to achieve suitable roles for both parents and professionals. What is Known: • Parents often play a role in shared decision-making What is New: • Parents and professionals can play different and various roles in decision-making • Most described roles can be played by both parents and professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39694955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.