ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Increased risk of adverse events following the treatment of associated versus elementary acetabular fractures: a matched analysis of short-term complications.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective cohort study aims to compare short-term complication rates between patients receiving open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for associated versus elementary acetabular fractures, with a secondary objective of identifying independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.
methodsThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes to identify patients that underwent ORIF for associated acetabular (CPT 27228) or elementary acetabular fractures (CPT 27226, 27227) from 2010 to 2021. Propensity score matching was employed to account for baseline differences and the short-term complication rates were compared between the cohorts.
resultsWe identified 1,330 patients who underwent ORIF for an acetabular fracture between 2010 and 2021, including 868 patients with elementary fractures and 462 with associated fractures. After matching, there were 462 patients in each cohort. The matched associated acetabular fracture group experienced higher rates of any adverse event (AAE, p = 0.029), transfusion (p = 0.010), and reoperation (p = 0.049). Increased age, increased operative time, higher body mass index (BMI), and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) augmented the risk of any complication.
conclusionThe findings of this study identify areas of greater risk of postoperative complications after ORIF in individuals with associated versus elementary acetabular fractures. Discussion of these heightened risks is critical to appropriate patient care. Understanding these risks plays an important role in the clinical decision-making process and may identify areas to monitor patients postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.