Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694910›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Metastatic breast cancer patients' preferences for exercise programs: a latent class analysis using data from a survey in five European countries.

Maike G Sweegers, Johanna Depenbusch, Neil K Aaronson, Anouk E Hiensch, Yvonne Wengström, Malin Backman, Nadira Gunasekara, Dorothea Clauss, Jon Belloso, Milena Lachowicz and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions and discussions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maike G SweegersCenter for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.sweegers@nki.nl.
Johanna DepenbuschDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Neil K AaronsonDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk E HienschJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yvonne WengströmDivision of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, and Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Malin BackmanDivision of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, and Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nadira GunasekaraDepartment for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dorothea ClaussDepartment for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jon BellosoGipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSID-Onkologikoa, BioGipuzkoa, Osakidetza, San Sebastian, Spain.
Milena LachowiczDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anne M MayJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karen SteindorfDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Martijn M StuiverCenter for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 825677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to identify metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients' preferences for exercise programs and identify patients' characteristics associated with these preferences, to facilitate implementation of exercise programs for MBC patients.

methodsWe used data from a multinational cross-sectional survey conducted among MBC patients. Patients reported their preferred exercise frequency, intensity, type, session duration, and supervision mode. We used latent class analysis to identify subgroups with similar preferences and descriptive statistics to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of patients within subgroups.

resultsFour distinct classes were identified based on data from 409 participants. Class 1 (47% of participants) is characterized by a preference for moderate exercise with supervision within the health care setting. Most participants in this class had bone metastases. Class 2 (30%) is characterized by a preference for vigorous exercise with supervision. This class included participants who were, on average, younger, and had a higher education level. Class 3 (13%) is characterized by a preference for active walking. These participants were less likely to have bone metastases or comorbidities. Class 4 (10%) is characterized by a preference for recreational walking and included participants who were, on average, older, and less likely to be employed.

conclusionWe identified four classes of patients with different preferences for exercise programs. Many patients with MBC express exercise preferences that meet the current guideline recommendations. Some patients with MBC may benefit from targeted education to align their preferences and behavior with the amount of exercise that is necessary to gain health benefits.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLatent Class AnalysisPatient PreferenceAdultAgedAge FactorsBone NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisSurveys and QuestionnairesExercise preferencesLatent class analysisMetastatic breast cancerPatient perspectives

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.