ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Pathology and molecular pathology of carcinoma of the penis].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the penis: a case report.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile carcinoma exhibits significant geographic variation in incidence, ranking 30th globally among newly diagnosed cancers with an annual rate of 0.84 cases per 100,000 men. Particularly high incidence rates of up to 2.2 are seen in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, largely due to a high prevalence of HPV, lower circumcision rates, and inadequate hygiene standards.The 2022 WHO classification of urogenital tumors continues to differentiate penile carcinomas based on their HPV status; however, the subdivision of numerous subtypes especially of the HPV(+) carcinomas was abandoned. This article aims to present current knowledge on the carcinogenesis of HPV(+) and HPV(-) penile carcinomas and their precursor lesions as well as updates from the latest WHO classification.Approximately 50% of penile carcinomas are caused by infection with high-risk HPV subtypes, with positive p16 immunohistochemistry serving as a good surrogate marker for HPV(+) tumors. HPV(-) carcinomas frequently show TP53 mutations and are associated with a poorer prognosis.While localized penile carcinomas have a relatively good prognosis, survival rates in metastatic cases remain poor. Neither microsatellite instability nor mismatch-repair deficiency appear to play a role, but up to 62.2% of tumors express PD-L1. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as Avelumab and Ipilimumab, along with antibody-drug conjugates targeting TROP2 and Nectin‑4, are being tested in clinical trials, potentially leading to the approval of targeted therapies for metastatic penile carcinoma in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39694900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.