Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694899›Full record

ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

The intrapelvic approach to the acetabulum.

Axel Gänsslen, Mario Staresinic, Dietmar Krappinger, Jan Lindahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Reduction techniques for acetabular fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. A sterile triangle positional assist for posterior approaches to the acetabulum in the lateral position: a technical trick.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Axel GänsslenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. dr.gaensslen@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-5049
Mario StaresinicClinic for Surgery, Department of General and Sports Traumatology, University Hospital "Merkur" Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dietmar KrappingerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jan LindahlDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The today well accepted intrapelvic approach for acetabular and pelvic ring injury fixation was first described by Hirvensalo and Lindahl in 1993 followed by a more detailed description by Cole and Bolhofner in 1994. Compared to the well-known ilioinguinal approach, described by Letournel, this approach allows an intrapelvic view to the medial acetabulum, while using the ilioinguinal approach a more superior, extrapelvic view, is dissected to the area of the acetabulum. Several names have been used to describe the new intrapelvic approach with increasing usage, mainly ilio-anterior approach, extended Pfannenstiel approach, Stoppa-approach, Rives-Stoppa approach, modified Stoppa approach and recently anterior intrapelvic approach. Especially names including "Stoppa", based on the French surgeon Rene Stoppa, an inguinal hernia surgeon, have been discussed. In contrast to the presently used intrapelvic approach, the original the Rives-Stoppa approach refers to a sublay-retromuscular technique, which places a mesh posterior to the rectus muscle and anterior to the posterior rectus sheath without dissecting along the upper pubic ramus. Thus, intrapelvic approach is not a Rives-Stoppa approach. The Cheatle-Henry approach, another inguinal hernia approach, refers best to the presently used intrapelvic approach. Discussing the anatomy and the different dissections, this approach allows anteromedial access to the anterior column and a direct view from inside the true pelvis to the quadrilateral plate and medial side of the posterior column. Thus, we favor to use the term "Intrapelvic Approach".

Indexed as

AcetabulumFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansPelvic BonesExtended intrapelvic approachIntrapelvic approachResultsStoppa´s hernia repair

Identifiers

PMID39694899
PMCPMC11655577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.