ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024
[Effectiveness of stepwise progressive ultra-tension-reducing suture method in treatment of high-tension wounds on chest, back, and limbs].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vertical Incision for Cosmetic Reduction of Giant Benign Breast Masses: A Case Report and Literature Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate effectiveness of a novel suture method-stepwise progressive ultra-tension-reducing suture method in closing high-tension wounds on the chest, back, and limbs. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 patients with high-tension wounds on the chest, back, and limbs who were treated with stepwise progressive ultra-tension-reducing suture method between January 2022 and December 2022. Among the patients, there were 8 males and 17 females, with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 18-56 years). All wounds after scar or tumor resection were located on the chest, back, upper limbs, and lower limbs in 8, 6, 9, and 2 cases, respectively. The size of wounds ranged from 3.5 cm×2.8 cm to 40.0 cm×15.0 cm. All patients were advised to use topical silicone-based treatments postoperatively. The protrusion of the incision, the height of the protrusion, and the duration of the tension reduction effect were observed. The scar formation at the incision site at 6 months after operation was observed, the scar appearance was evaluated by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, and the scar width was measured. The patient's satisfaction and adverse reactions to incisions were also evaluated. Results: The incisions significantly elevated, with a height of 0.3-2.5 cm, and the tension reducing effect lasted for 8.5-18.0 weeks after operation, with an average of 13.6 weeks. All incisons healed by first intention. One patient experienced transient hyperpigmentation, which resolved spontaneously. Three keloid patients showed localized redness postoperatively, and 2 experienced local recurrence, which improved significantly after treatment with triamcinolone, 5-fluorouracil injections, and laser therapy. All patients were followed up 6.0-13.5 months, with an average of 10.1 months. At 6 months after operation, all patients had linear scars, with VSS scores ranging from 1.0 to 3.5 (mean, 2.0). The width of the scars ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 mm (mean, 1.4 mm). The patients expressed satisfaction with the effectiveness. Conclusion: The stepwise progressive ultra-tension-reducing suture method for high-tension wounds can effectively reduce the tension at the wound edges, providing a prolonged tension-reducing effect and satisfactory effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.