Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694840›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024

[A comparative study of dynamic versus static rehabilitation protocols after acute Achilles tendon rupture repair with channel assisted minimally invasive repair technique].

Zhonghe Wang, Lingtong Kong, Wenhao Cao, Junjun Tang, Hongzhe Qi, Meijing Dou, Haoyu Liu, Chen Chen, Hua Chen

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhonghe WangSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Lingtong KongSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Wenhao CaoSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Junjun TangSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Hongzhe QiSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Meijing DouSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Haoyu LiuSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Chen ChenSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Hua ChenSenior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the difference in effectiveness between a dynamic rehabilitation protocol and a traditional static rehabilitation protocol after the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture with channel assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique through a prospective comparative trial, aiming to provide a reference for clinically selecting a feasible treatment regimen. Methods: Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture admitted between June 2021 and June 2022 were included in the study, with 60 patients meeting the selection criteria. They were randomly divided into a dynamic rehabilitation group ( Results: No sural nerve injury occurred during operation in both groups. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14 months). The dynamic rehabilitation group had significantly higher ATRS scores at 3 and 6 months after operation compared to the static rehabilitation group ( Conclusion: For acute Achilles tendon rupture, the dynamic rehabilitation protocol after Achilles tendon anastomosis by using CAMIR technique can improve early functional recovery and maintains comparable safety and effectiveness compared to static rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTendon InjuriesAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRuptureTreatment OutcomeAcute Achilles tendon rupturedynamic rehabilitationminimally invasive surgeryprospective trialstatic rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39694840
PMCPMC11655372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.