ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2025
How well do plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers reflect the CSF amyloid status?
Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Extracellular Vesicle-Derived microRNAs as Fluid Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Pooled it
- Advancements in Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diagnostics: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Improved Multiscale Structural Mapping with Supervertex Vision Transformer for the Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Neurodegeneration.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Baseline plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 as a sensitive marker for the severity of Alzheimer's disease continuum.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- P-tau217 as a Biomarker in Alzheimer's Disease: Applications in Latin American Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cross-sectional study of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 in persons without dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2026
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCan plasma biomarkers as well as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) perform in the separation of amyloid-beta-positive (Aβ+) vs amyloid-beta-negative (Aβ-) groups across an age range seen in an NHS cognitive disorder clinic?
methodsAs part of the routine diagnostic investigation of 111 clinic patients who had contemporaneous blood and CSF samples taken, patients were categorised into Aβ+ and Aβ- groups based on their CSF in an Aβ42/40 ratio. We then evaluated four single molecule array (Simoa) Quanterix assays, quantifying single plasma analytes and ratios (p-tau217, p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, p-tau181, p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio and Aβ42/40 ratio) in their ability to distinguish between these groups and the effect of age.
resultsThe median (range) age of participants was 66 (55-79) years with 48 females (43.2%). The areas under the curve (AUC), not accounting for age, for the ability to discriminate Aβ+ from Aβ- groups were plasma p-tau217 AUC=0.94, Aβ42/40 AUC=0.78 and p-tau181 AUC=0.77. Combining p-tau217/Aβ42 increased the AUC to 0.97. The difference between the groups was influenced by age with less separation in older individuals: a significant negative interaction term between age and group for plasma p-tau217 concentrations (-0.037, p=0.013) and p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio (-0.007, p=0.008).
conclusionsThere was variable performance of plasma biomarkers to recapitulate the CSF assay. Both p-tau217 and p-tau217/Aβ42 showed excellent promise as surrogates of CSF amyloid status, although with slightly reduced performance in older individuals. There was poorer discriminatory ability for p-tau181 and Aβ42/40. Further research is needed to address potential age-related confounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.