Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694821›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2025

How well do plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers reflect the CSF amyloid status?

Jemma Hazan, Emily Abel, Miguel Rosa Grilo, Deborah Alawode, Ines Laranjinha, Amanda J Heslegrave, Kathy Y Liu, Jonathan M Schott, Robert Howard, Henrik Zetterberg and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jemma HazanDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK j.hazan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-4768
Emily AbelUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.
Miguel Rosa GriloUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Deborah AlawodeUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.
Ines LaranjinhaUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.
Amanda J HeslegraveUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-6405
Kathy Y LiuUCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-2758
Jonathan M SchottDementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2059-024X
Robert HowardUCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Henrik ZetterbergUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4354
Nick C FoxUCL, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCan plasma biomarkers as well as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) perform in the separation of amyloid-beta-positive (Aβ+) vs amyloid-beta-negative (Aβ-) groups across an age range seen in an NHS cognitive disorder clinic?

methodsAs part of the routine diagnostic investigation of 111 clinic patients who had contemporaneous blood and CSF samples taken, patients were categorised into Aβ+ and Aβ- groups based on their CSF in an Aβ42/40 ratio. We then evaluated four single molecule array (Simoa) Quanterix assays, quantifying single plasma analytes and ratios (p-tau217, p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, p-tau181, p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio and Aβ42/40 ratio) in their ability to distinguish between these groups and the effect of age.

resultsThe median (range) age of participants was 66 (55-79) years with 48 females (43.2%). The areas under the curve (AUC), not accounting for age, for the ability to discriminate Aβ+ from Aβ- groups were plasma p-tau217 AUC=0.94, Aβ42/40 AUC=0.78 and p-tau181 AUC=0.77. Combining p-tau217/Aβ42 increased the AUC to 0.97. The difference between the groups was influenced by age with less separation in older individuals: a significant negative interaction term between age and group for plasma p-tau217 concentrations (-0.037, p=0.013) and p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio (-0.007, p=0.008).

conclusionsThere was variable performance of plasma biomarkers to recapitulate the CSF assay. Both p-tau217 and p-tau217/Aβ42 showed excellent promise as surrogates of CSF amyloid status, although with slightly reduced performance in older individuals. There was poorer discriminatory ability for p-tau181 and Aβ42/40. Further research is needed to address potential age-related confounds.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsALZHEIMER'S DISEASECSFDEMENTIA

Identifiers

PMID39694821
PMCPMC12171523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.