Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694689›Full record

ArticleFEMS yeast research2025

Exploring pectinolytic yeast diversity: toward effective polygalacturonase producers for applications in wine-making.

Mehmet Gazaloğlu, Carole Camarasa, Elke Nevoigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS yeast research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehmet GazaloğluSchool of Science, Constructor University, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1675-2795
Carole CamarasaUMR SPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7675-1909
Elke NevoigtSchool of Science, Constructor University, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-3000

Funding

European Union 764927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pectinolytic enzymes secreted by yeasts have an untapped potential in industry, particularly in wine-making. This study addresses the limitations of the current screening methods in reliably predicting the capacity of pectinolytic yeast strains to secrete polygalacturonase (PGase) under industrial conditions, suggesting a novel screening approach. Using the context of wine-making as an example, a diverse collection of 512 yeast strains from 17 species was analysed for PGase secretion, a key enzyme in pectinolysis. The traditional halo assay on solid yeast-pepton-dextrose (YPD) medium revealed 118 strains from nine genera being PGase positive. Screening these strains by incubating them at 20°C on a solid synthetic grape juice medium containing polygalacturonic acid (PG) significantly reduced the number of promising strains to 35. They belong to five genera: Kluyveromyces sp., Cryptococcus, Pichia, Torulaspora, and Rhodotorula. Afterward, a newly developed pectin-iodine assay was used to precisely quantify the PGase activity of the best-performing strains in a liquid medium. Strains from Kluyveromyces and Cryptococcus sp. stood out regarding high pectinolytic activity. Our methodological advancements tailored to identify highly promising pectinolytic yeasts for industrial use open new avenues for wine-making and other industrial processes encompassing media rich in pectin and sugars.

Indexed as

PolygalacturonaseWineYeastsCulture MediaIndustrial MicrobiologyPectinsCulture MediaPectinsPolygalacturonasepolygalacturonic acidpectinpectinasepectinolytic activitypolygalacturonasescreeningwine-makingyeast

Identifiers

PMID39694689
PMCPMC11781195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.