ArticleBMJ global health2024
Prioritising and including children in intersectoral policymaking: uncovering Immunity to Change in Ghana.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Involving children in global health policy and programming: practical guidance to get started.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite strong commitments to improving children's well-being, nearly a third of Ghanaian children aged 36-59 months are not developmentally on track, with additional challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Improvements in children's health and well-being rely on effective intersectoral policies, however, not enough is known about how to achieve this in practice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We report on a case study of participatory intersectoral policymaking for child health in Ghana in 2021, feeding into the national Early Childhood Care and Development Policy. We used systematic methods to analyse policy documents from 22 Ministries, Departments and Agencies; procedural outputs from national policy convenings; and children's inputs via a national competition, worksheets at a policy convening and video interviews. Data sources were analysed separately using content analysis for real-time application of findings into the policy process. Subsequently, data were re-analysed together, using an 'insider-outsider' approach, to provide a holistic view of the policy process. Beyond traditional child-centred policy areas (ie, health, education, youth and sports, social protection), most ministries lacked budgeted child-specific policies, partly because policymakers felt this was outside their mandate. Analysing children's inputs to the policy process showed they had substantive policy ideas on their health and well-being that were intersectoral in nature. While underlying social and cultural assumptions about children's place in society impeded their participation in policymaking, stakeholders nonetheless expressed their commitment to amplifying and institutionalising children's contributions. Our study adds evidence on how to operationalise intersectoral partnerships, including by mapping mandates, budgets and roles across different functions and levels of government, with the mobilising participation of civil society. We also report on new mechanisms for including children's perspectives in policymaking. Our findings have implications for child health policy and for other health initiatives that require effective intersectoral, participatory approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.