Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Distal Circulation Aneurysms: A Randomized Comparison.
Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFlow diversion (FD) has expanded beyond initial indications (proximal carotid artery aneurysms) to include distal circulation aneurysms (on the anterior, middle, or posterior cerebral arteries). Our objective was to examine results obtained from aneurysms in these locations in the Flow Diversion in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Trial (FIAT), which compared FD with alternative standard management options (ASMO). MATERIALS AND
methodsFIAT was an all-inclusive parallel-group 1:1 randomized study comparing FD with 1 of 4 ASMOs (coiling +/- stenting, parent vessel occlusion [PVO], clipping, or observation, prespecified by clinical judgment). The primary safety outcome was death or dependency (mRS >2) at 3 months. The composite primary outcome was "treatment failure," defined as initial failure to treat the aneurysm; aneurysm rupture or retreatment during follow-up; death or dependency (mRS >2); or angiographic residual aneurysm adjudicated by an independent core laboratory at 12 months. This subgroup analysis was not prespecified, and there was no blinding.
resultsOf the 323 patients in FIAT, 46 (14%) with distal circulation aneurysms were randomly allocated: 23 to FD and 23 to ASMO (coiling +/- stenting 16 patients; PVO, 1 patient; clipping, 3 patients; and observation, 3 patients). Death or dependency at 3 months occurred in 1 patient (allocated ASMO). Treatment failures occurred in 6/23 FD-treated patients (26.1%; 95% CI, 12.6%-46.5%) compared with 11/22 patients treated with ASMO (50.0%; 95% CI, 30.7%-69.3%) (risk ratio = 0.52 [0.23-1.17];
conclusionsDistal circulation aneurysms treated with FDs in FIAT showed an encouraging trend, but this analysis was underpowered. Further randomized trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.