ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Change in Emergency Department Length of Stay following Routine Adoption of Dual-Energy CT to Differentiate Intracranial Hemorrhage from Calcification.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What you don't see matters: dual-energy CT in emergency radiology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDual-energy CT (DECT) is an advanced CT technique that has been shown to improve accuracy in distinguishing between intracranial hemorrhage and calcification, which is often challenging on conventional CT and therefore may warrant repeat imaging in the emergency department (ED) to document stability and exclude enlarging intracranial hemorrhage. We hypothesized that implementation of a DECT head protocol in the ED would decrease the need for repeat imaging and therefore reduce overall ED length of stay (LOS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study comparing ED LOS over a 1-year period before (July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017) and after (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019) implementing a DECT head protocol, for patients scanned for headache, trauma, or fall who were found to have indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities on conventional images, and were subsequently discharged home from the ED (excluding patients who were admitted, taken to the operating room, or left against medical advice). Additional clinical information regarding ED time course and management were also reviewed, including data on time to CT scan, CT report, and if applicable, time to repeat head CT and neurosurgical consultation.
resultsThere was no significant difference in patient demographics and CT indications between the pre-DECT and post-DECT cohorts. There was a small but statistically significant difference in mean baseline ED LOS in the initial cohorts of 20 minutes (
conclusionsED LOS was significantly longer in the pre-DECT cohort, which was partly attributable to neurosurgical consultation and repeat head CT performed for indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.