Observational studyFukushima journal of medical science2025
Drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on the isolation sites and types of gastrointestinal diseases: An observational study.
Observational study in Fukushima journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe investigated the drug resistance status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) focusing on its isolation sites and types of diseases. Materials and methods: A microbiological laboratory database was searched to identify all clinical cultures positive for P. aeruginosa. Clinicopathologic features and susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to any antibiotics were evaluated in patients admitted to the division of upper (Upper-GI group) or lower gastrointestinal surgery (Lower-GI group). In addition, we investigated the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to any antibiotics based on the isolation site. Results:P. aeruginosa was frequently detected in the sputum and urine of the Upper-GI and Lower-GI groups, respectively. Among P. aeruginosa isolates from drain discharge, a significantly higher rate of resistance to imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin was observed; among P. aeruginosa isolates from wounds, a substantially higher proportion had resistance to imipenem and cefozopran in the Upper-GI group. However, there was no difference between the two groups in the drug resistance of P. aeruginosa isolated from urine, sputum, blood, and ascites. P. aeruginosa isolated from sputum showed more resistance to imipenem and ciprofloxacin than those isolated from other sites. Conclusion: There were significant differences in the drug resistance of P. aeruginosa based on the isolation sites and types of diseases. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.