ReviewFukushima journal of medical science2025
Pharmacologic background and clinical issue of anti-influenza drugs.
Review in Fukushima journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of baloxavir versus those of oseltamivir in pediatric patients with influenza: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Influenza-Associated Cardiac Manifestations: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Influenza Drugs in 160 Chinese Children With Influenza A: A Retrospective Study.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir for seasonal influenza treatment in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2000, rapid antigen detection kits and anti-influenza drugs have been used for the early diagnosis and treatment of influenza in Japan, respectively. The main drugs available in clinical practice are the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir, as well as the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir marboxil. Antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors has been practiced for many years, especially in Japan; it can shorten the febrile period and reduce complications. Despite having similar structures, the pharmacologic background of neuraminidase inhibitors differs significantly, as reflected in their varying clinical efficacy. Due to its inhibitory mechanism, baloxavir marboxil can rapidly reduce the viral load than neuraminidase inhibitors. However, the duration of symptoms was similar after the administration of baloxavir marboxil and oseltamivir, and variants with reduced drug susceptibility have been detected in 20%-30% of pediatric patients treated with baloxavir marboxil. Clinical trials of several novel anti-influenza drugs are currently underway. When these drugs are first marketed, the characteristics of the influenza virus and the pharmacologic background of the drugs must be clarified before their administration to patients in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.