Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694463›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2025

Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning and radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

Jie Ren, Xingpeng Li, Mengke Liu, Tingting Cui, Jia Guo, Rongjie Zhou, Kun Hao, Rengui Wang, Yunlong Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jie RenDepartment of MRI, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xingpeng LiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mengke LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tingting CuiDepartment of MRI, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia GuoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Rongjie ZhouDepartment of MRI, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kun HaoDepartment of Lymphatic Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Rengui WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yunlong YueDepartment of MRI, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yueyunlong@bjsjth.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccording to International Lymphology Society guidelines, the severity of lymphedema is determined by the difference in volume between the affected limb and the healthy side divided by the volume of the healthy side. However, this method of measuring volume is time consuming, laborious, and has certain errors in clinical applications. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether machine learning radiomics features based on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 119 patients with primary lower limb lymphedema. The enrolled patients were divided into a nonsevere group (mild and moderate) and a severe group. Using the semiautomatic threshold method in ITK-snap software on the patient's noncontrast MRI, we filled the area between the subcutaneous tissue and muscle of the edematous site. The PyRadiomics software package was used to extract radiomic features. The radiomic features were analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney test. Subsequently, Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening were performed. Using Scikit-learn, the remaining features were used to construct five models: logistic regression, support vector machine, random Forest, ExtraTrees, and light gradient boosting machine. The predictive performance were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and specificity of these measures were calculated. The predictive curve was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive model in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.

resultsThe enrolled patients including 28 patients with mild lymphedema (grade I), 38 patients with moderate lymphedema (grade II), and 53 patients with severe lymphedema (grade III) was conducted. A total of 1196 features were extracted, and after Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening, 21 nonzero features were selected. The ExtraTree model performed the best, with an area under the curve of 0.974 (95% confidence interval, 0.9437-1.0000) in the training set, a sensitivity of 89.2%, and a specificity of 95.7%. In the test set, these values were 0.938 (95% confidence interval, 0.8539-1.0000), 75%, and 100%, respectively. The decision curve showed that when the predicted probability was between 16% and 78%, the net benefit of the ExtraTree model was greater than that of the two extreme curves, indicating strong clinical value in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.

conclusionsAll five models performed well in distinguishing between the nonsevere group and the severe group. Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLower ExtremityLymphedemaMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexLower extremityLymphedemaMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39694463
PMCPMC12014297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.