ArticleEnvironmental research2025
Professionally and non-professionally applied household insecticides during pregnancy and early life and their associations with autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay in the CHARGE case-control study.
Article in Environmental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pollutant Burden in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Mechanistic Convergence, Genetic Susceptibility, and Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Pet Flea and Tick Control Exposure During Pregnancy and Early Life Associated with Decreased Cognitive and Adaptive Behaviors in Children with Developmental Delay and Autism Spectrum Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is an increasing concern globally, with risks attributed to both genetic and environmental factors, including pesticide exposures. The CHARGE case-control study collected data to examine the relationship between household insecticide use and ASD or developmental delay (DD).
methodsParticipants (n = 1526) aged 2-5 years from the CHARGE study encompassed children with clinically confirmed ASD (n = 810), DD (n = 186), and typically developing controls (n = 530) frequency matched to ASD children by age, sex, and geographic region. Household insecticide use was determined from parent interviews, as were the timing, frequency, and type of applications (professionally or non-professionally applied; indoor, outdoor, and flea applications) from three months pre-conception to the child's second birthday. Logistic regression models were adjusted for confounders to estimate odds ratios (OR) for ASD or DD associated with insecticide exposure.
resultsProfessionally applied indoor insecticides were associated with greater than two-fold increased odds of ASD for all time periods (OR: pre-pregnancy, 2.62 (1.26, 5.44); pregnancy, 2.52 (1.41, 4.48); year 1, 2.20 (1.33, 3.64); year 2, 2.13 (1.29, 3.49)). Odds were also elevated for any outdoor application during years 1 and 2 (OR: 1.37 (1.05, 1.79) and 1.34 (1.03, 1.74), respectively), however, significance did not hold after false discovery rate correction. Higher exposure frequency was associated with greater odds of ASD for nearly all application types and time periods. Non-professional indoor insecticide use was associated with increased odds of DD in trimester 3 and the pregnancy period (OR: 1.72 (1.03, 2.89) and 1.58 (1.03, 2.40), respectively).
conclusionProfessionally applied indoor insecticides were consistently associated with ASD. The strong trend of increased odds with more frequent exposures, additional evidence for DD, and widespread use of household insecticides support increased regulatory scrutiny and public health interventions to minimize exposure during critical developmental windows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.