ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2025
Computer modeling of bevacizumab drug distribution after intravitreal injection in rabbit and human eyes.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical real-world data evaluation: comparison of central macular thickness after anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients treated with or without topical anti-glaucoma agents.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic model for drug delivery by Ozurdex.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Computational modeling of intravitreal ranibizumab kinetics: Predicting macular drug concentration and half-life.PloS one · 2026Article
- Ultrastructural and Immunohistochemical Study on the Nephrotoxicity Following Intravitreal Administration of the Antifungal Agents Voriconazole and Micafungin in New Zealand White Rabbits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Modeling and Design of Chitosan-PCL Bi-Layered Microspheres for Intravitreal Controlled Release.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive eye disease that causes loss of central vision and has no cure. Wet AMD is the late neovascular form treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. VEGF is the critical driver of wet AMD. One common off-label anti-VEGF drug used in AMD treatment is bevacizumab. Experimental efforts have been made to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of bevacizumab in vitreous and aqueous humor. Still, the quantitative effect of elimination routes and drug concentration in the macula are not well understood. In this work, we developed two spatial models representing rabbit and human vitreous to better understand the PK behavior of bevacizumab. This study explores different cases of drug elimination and the effects of injection location on drug concentration profiles. The models are validated by comparing them with experimental data. Our results suggest that anterior elimination is dominant for bevacizumab clearance from rabbit vitreous, whereas both anterior and posterior elimination have similar importance in drug clearance from the human vitreous. Furthermore, results indicate that drug injections closer to the posterior segment of the vitreous help maintain relevant drug concentrations for longer, improving bevacizumab duration of action in the vitreous. The rabbit and human models predict bevacizumab concentration in the vitreous and fovea, enhancing knowledge and understanding of wet AMD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.