Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694166›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Assessment of the vaginal microbiota before and after use of hyperosmolal lubricant during transvaginal ultrasound.

Sarah E Brown, Xin He, Laurence Magder, Christina A Stennett, Sarah J Robbins, Elizabeth D Johnston, Daniel Morgan, Khalil G Ghanem, Jacques Ravel, Katrina Mark and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah E BrownDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Xin HeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Laurence MagderDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Christina A StennettDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Sarah J RobbinsDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Elizabeth D JohnstonUniversity of Maryland, Faculty Physicians Inc, Baltimore, MD.
Daniel MorganDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Khalil G GhanemDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jacques RavelInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Katrina MarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Rebecca M BrotmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: rbrotman@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AGINGT32AG000262 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ANN L GRUBER-BALDINI, DENISE L ORWIG · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
Lubricant Use and the Vaginal MicrobiomeR01AI119012 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BROTMAN, REBECCA M. · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
Methods to Test the Role of Age-related Lifestyle and Vaginal Microenvironment Changes and the Prevention, Treatment, and Progression of Genitourinary Syndrome of MenopauseR01AG069915 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REBECCA M. BROTMAN, Michelle Denise Shardell · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI119012NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069915NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal lubricants are commonly used during sexual activity and clinical procedures such as transvaginal ultrasound. Epidemiologic and laboratory studies indicate hyperosmolal water-based lubricants may disrupt the vaginal microbiota, particularly the beneficial Lactobacillus spp. These bacteria play a critical role in protecting against sexually transmitted infection acquisition and other adverse gynecologic and obstetric outcomes.

objectiveWe sought to evaluate changes in the composition of the vaginal microbiota before and after a single exposure to lubricant over a 10-week period among pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients referred for transvaginal ultrasound. STUDY

designOne hundred four participants self-collected mid-vaginal swabs daily between baseline and transvaginal ultrasound (∼1 week), immediately before transvaginal ultrasound ("pre-transvaginal ultrasound"), and 6 to 12 hours after transvaginal ultrasound ("post-transvaginal ultrasound"). Participants attended a follow-up visit ∼2 to 5 days after transvaginal ultrasound ("post-transvaginal ultrasound follow-up"), continued to self-sample twice-weekly for 9 weeks, and attended a final clinical visit in week 10. Microbiota composition was characterized by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing (V3-V4) and assigned to community state types (low-Lactobacillus vs Lactobacillus-dominated). Yue-Clayton theta indices defined similarity between daily successive samples between baseline and transvaginal ultrasound and overall stability of the vaginal microbiota before and after transvaginal ultrasound. Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes II determined differentially abundant taxa in post-transvaginal ultrasound samples vs pre-transvaginal ultrasound samples. Generalized linear mixed models evaluated the odds of having a low-Lactobacillus microbiota after transvaginal ultrasound with samples before transvaginal ultrasound as the reference for each participant.

resultsA majority of the cohort was premenopausal (85/104, 82%) and self-reported Black race (65/104, 62%). Over the short-term (1 week), there was no immediate changes in the composition of the microbiota of daily successive samples following transvaginal ultrasound. In contrast, over the longer-term (participants followed for 10 weeks), the vaginal microbiota was less stable within intervals after transvaginal ultrasound vs the interval before. There were no changes in the odds of a low-Lactobacillus microbiota after transvaginal ultrasound among all participants in this 10-week longitudinal study. However, in specific groups such as peri/postmenopausal participants (N=19, adjusted odds ratio: 3.22, 95% confidence interval:1.16-8.98) and those with a history of bacterial vaginosis (N=58, adjusted odds ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval:1.10-2.72), there was a higher likelihood of persisting in a low-Lactobacillus state throughout the follow-up period.

conclusionPeri- and postmenopausal individuals and those with a history of bacterial vaginosis show a sustained decrease in protective Lactobacillus spp. after a single exposure to hyperosmolal vaginal lubricant. Reformulating water-based lubricants to reduce osmolality and toxicity may be beneficial.

Indexed as

LubricantsMicrobiotaVaginaAdultFemaleHumansLactobacillusMiddle AgedPostmenopausePremenopauseUltrasonographyLubricantsbacterial vaginosislubricantpostmenopausaltransvaginal ultrasoundvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID39694166
PMCPMC12167751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.