Trial reportPreventive medicine2025
Association of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status with outcomes of a smoking cessation intervention provided in the lung cancer screening setting.
Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03611881 (Assessing the Integration of Tobacco Cessation Treatment Into Lung Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing the Integration of Tobacco Cessation Treatment Into Lung Cancer Screening
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of neighbor-level disadvantage on survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) offers a teachable moment for smoking cessation. This study assesses whether individual- or neighborhood-level SES is associated with tobacco abstinence and completion of a smoking cessation intervention in the LCS context.
methodsSecondary analysis of a clinical trial (NCT03611881) that tested the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment for smokers scheduled for LCS (N = 615) in eastern Massachusetts, USA from 2019 to 2024. Outcomes were self-reported 7-day smoking abstinence and study follow-up completion at 6-months. Independent variables were individual SES (high school or less [low SES] vs. post-high school education [high SES]); neighborhood SES (Area Deprivation Index [ADI], range: 0-100, categorized as: highest 15 % [low SES] vs. remaining 85 % scores [high SES]), and a combination of both measures. Logistic regression models tested the association between outcomes and SES measures, adjusted for covariates.
results32 % of participants had low individual SES. The mean sample ADI was 19.9 (SD: 12.8). Smoking cessation was higher among those with high vs. low neighborhood SES (15.7 % vs. 7.4 %, p-value = 0.03). Study completion was marginally higher among those with high vs. low individual SES (84.5 % vs. 78.1 %, p = 0.05). In multivariable models, these associations were not significant, but individuals with high individual and low neighborhood SES were more likely to complete the study than those with both low individual and low neighborhood SES, (OR: 6.04, 95 %CI: 1.47-24.7).
conclusionIndividual and neighborhood SES were not independently associated with the study outcomes in the multivariable analysis, but combinations of individual and neighborhood SES differentially affected treatment completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.