Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694032›Full record

ReviewNeuron2025

The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s?

Jieyu Zheng, Markus Meister

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebral capillary computation.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jieyu ZhengDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: jzzheng@caltech.edu.
Markus MeisterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: meister@caltech.edu.

Funding

Neural Computation for Innate Behaviors in the Superior ColliculusR01NS111477 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MEISTER, MARKUS · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is about the neural conundrum behind the slowness of human behavior. The information throughput of a human being is about 10 bits/s. In comparison, our sensory systems gather data at ∼10

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsAnimalsHumansattentionbottleneckhuman behaviorinformation ratememory sportsneural computationneural efficiencyspeed of cognition

Identifiers

PMID39694032
PMCPMC11758279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.