Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39694029›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025

Tubulin sequence divergence is associated with the use of distinct microtubule regulators.

Andrew S Kennard, Katrina B Velle, Ravi Ranjan, Danae Schulz, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cilia and transcription: a mini review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew S KennardDepartment of Biology and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts, 611 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Katrina B VelleDepartment of Biology and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts, 611 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003, USA; Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA.
Ravi RanjanGenomics Resource Laboratory, Institute of Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 240 Thatcher Road, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Danae SchulzDepartment of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Blvd, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Biology and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts, 611 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: lfritzlaylin@umass.edu.

Funding

Chytrid fungi and the functional specification of actin networksR35GM143039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FRITZ-LAYLIN, LILLIAN KATHLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Defining cytoskeletal mechanisms driving cell motility in NaegleriaK99GM147656 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI VELLE, KATRINA · 2022 to 2023
$146k
Defining mechanisms of mitotic spindle organization in NaegleriaF32GM148023 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI KENNARD, ANDREW STEVEN · 2022 to 2024
$141k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM148023NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM147656NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse eukaryotic cells assemble microtubule networks that vary in structure and composition. While we understand how cells build microtubule networks with specialized functions, we do not know how microtubule networks diversify across deep evolutionary timescales. This problem has remained unresolved because most organisms use shared pools of tubulins for multiple networks, making it difficult to trace the evolution of any single network. In contrast, the amoeboflagellate Naegleria expresses distinct tubulin genes to build distinct microtubule networks: while Naegleria builds flagella from conserved tubulins during differentiation, it uses divergent tubulins to build its mitotic spindle. This genetic separation makes for an internally controlled system to study independent microtubule networks in a single organismal and genomic context. To explore the evolution of these microtubule networks, we identified conserved microtubule-binding proteins and used transcriptional profiling of mitosis and differentiation to determine which are upregulated during the assembly of each network. Surprisingly, most microtubule-binding proteins are upregulated during only one process, suggesting that Naegleria uses distinct component pools to specialize its microtubule networks. Furthermore, the divergent residues of mitotic tubulins tend to fall within the binding sites of differentiation-specific microtubule regulators, suggesting that interactions between microtubules and their binding proteins constrain tubulin sequence diversification. We therefore propose a model for cytoskeletal evolution in which pools of microtubule network components constrain and guide the diversification of the entire network, so that the evolution of tubulin is inextricably linked to that of its binding partners.

Indexed as

MicrotubulesNaegleriaProtozoan ProteinsTubulinEvolution, MolecularProtozoan ProteinsTubulinevolutionary cell biologymicrotubule lumenmicrotubulesNaegleriaRNA-Seqsequence conservationtranscriptomicstubulin

Identifiers

PMID39694029
PMCPMC11753955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.