Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693316›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Prevalence of nasopharyngeal Streptococcus Pneumoniae carriage in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials.

Gulzhan Beissegulova, Bakyt Ramazanova, Kamilya Mustafina, Tolkyn Begadilova, Yekaterina Koloskova, Bibigul Seitkhanova, Aliya Mamatova, Ulzhan Iskakova, Ratbek Sailaubekuly, Zhaksylyk Seiitbay

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence and serotype distribution of nasopharyngeal carriage ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Article
  2. Early-life carriage and antibiotic resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gulzhan BeissegulovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-2762
Bakyt RamazanovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Kamilya MustafinaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-4047
Tolkyn BegadilovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Yekaterina KoloskovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6329-5032
Bibigul SeitkhanovaDepartment of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7756-2659
Aliya MamatovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-0669-9831
Ulzhan IskakovaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Ratbek SailaubekulyDepartment of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0009-0481-2667
Zhaksylyk SeiitbaySchool of General Medicine-2, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0007-7637-3283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to examine the prevalence of nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage (NSPC) in infants during their first two years of life and to compare the carriage rates among different vaccine groups and country income-levels. This will be achieved through a systematic review of the published literature, specifically focusing on data from cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive search was conducted in four electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, using a predefined search strategy. Forty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. According to the results obtained from the random effects model, the pooled mean prevalence of NSPC was 1.68% at birth (95% CI [0.50; 5.47]), 24.38% at 1 to 4 months (95% CI [19.06; 30.62]), 48.38% at 4 to 6 months (95% CI [41.68; 55.13]), 59.14% at 7 to 9 months (95% CI [50.88; 66.91]), 48.41% at 10 to 12 months (95% CI [41.54; 55.35]), 42.00% at 13 to 18 months (95% CI [37.01; 47.16]), and 48.34% at 19 to 24 months (95% CI [38.50; 58.31]). The highest NSPC rates were observed among children aged 4 to 6 months and 7 to 9 months across all vaccine groups. Low-income countries consistently demonstrated the highest NSPC rates across all age categories studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide robust evidence of the high prevalence of NSPC in infants aged 4 to 6 months and 7 to 9 months in all vaccine groups, with persistent regional disparities, especially among low-income countries. The study highlights the need for continuous monitoring of NSPC trends, particularly the emergence of non-vaccine serotypes. Policymakers and healthcare providers should leverage these findings to enhance vaccination strategies, aiming to minimize the overall burden of pneumococcal diseases in infants.

Indexed as

Carrier StateNasopharynxPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesStreptococcus pneumoniaeCohort StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrevalenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39693316
PMCPMC11654947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.