ArticlePloS one2024
Early detection of heart failure using in-patient longitudinal electronic health records.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart Failure (HF) is common, with worldwide prevalence of 1%-3% and a lifetime risk of 20% for individuals 40 years or older. Despite its considerable health economic burden, techniques for early detection of HF in the general population are sparse. In this work we tested the hypothesis that a simple Transformer neural network, trained on comprehensive collection of secondary care data across the general population, can be used to prospectively (three-year predictive window) identify patients at an increased risk of first hospitalisation due to HF (HHF). The model was trained using routinely-collected, secondary care health data, including patient demographics, A&E attendances, hospitalisations, outpatient data, medications, blood tests, and vital sign measurements obtained across five years of longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs). The training cohort consisted of n = 183,894 individuals (n = 161,658 age/sex-matched controls and n = 22,236 of first hospitalisation due to HF after a three-year predictive window). Model performance was validated in an independent testing set of n = 8,977 patients (n = 945 HHF patients). Testing set probabilities were well-calibrated and achieved good discriminatory power with Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC]) of 0.86, sensitivity of 36.4% (95% CI: 33.33%-39.56%), specificity of 98.26% (95% CI: 97.95%-98.53%), and PPV of 69.88% (95% CI: 65.86%-73.62%). At Probability of HHF ≥ 90% the model achieved 100% PPV (95% CI: 96.73%-100%) and sensitivity of 11.7% (95% CI: 9.72%-13.91%). Performance was not affected by patient sex or socioeconomic deprivation deciles. Performance was significantly better in Asian, Black, and Mixed ethnicities (AUROC 0.932-0.945) and in the 79-86 age group (AUROC 0.889). We present the first evidence that routinely collected secondary care health record data can be used in the general population to stratify patients at risk of first HHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.