Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Cognition, function, and mood post-COVID-19: Comparative analysis using the health and retirement study.

Han Su, Pei-Lin Yang, Tammy L Eaton, Thomas S Valley, Kenneth M Langa, E Wesley Ely, Hilaire J Thompson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Han SuSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5260-8139
Pei-Lin YangSchool of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tammy L EatonVeterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development, Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-0527
Thomas S ValleyVeterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development, Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kenneth M LangaVeterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development, Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
E Wesley ElyCritical Illness, Brain Dysfunction and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Hilaire J ThompsonSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of Americans endure post-COVID conditions (PCC), yet research often lacks pre-illness measurements, relying primarily on follow-up assessments for analysis. The study aims to examine the prevalence of PCC, including cognitive impairment, functional limitation, and depressive symptoms, along with relevant risk factors, while controlling for individuals' pre-illness status measured in 2018. A cross-sectional retrospective study utilized the 2018 and 2020 Health and Retirement Study surveys. Sample included individuals with COVID-19 (n = 409; average age 64) and individuals without COVID-19 (n = 8689; average age 59). COVID-19 positive: Individuals with positive tests, physician diagnoses, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations for COVID-19 between 2019-2020. Cognition was assessed using immediate and delayed word-recall tests, serial seven subtractions, and backward counting. Functional status was measured using limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs. Depressive symptoms were measured using the modified Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression scale. Participants' perception of experiencing PCC was collected. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed for these analyses. Among 409 COVID-19-positive respondents (14% hospitalized), 24% exhibited new impairments after COVID-19 infection. Noteworthy increases in functional limitation (OR [95% CI]: 2.18 [0.95, 0.97], p < 0.001) and a marginal rise in cognitive impairment (1.79 [0.99, 3.32], p = 0.053) following COVID-19 infection were observed in comparison to their pre-COVID-19 baseline. Compared to 8689 non-COVID-19 cases, the 409 COVID-19 positives showed increased functional decline (1.78 [1.26, 2.51], p = 0.001) and depressive symptoms (1.41 [1.04, 1.91], p = 0.03). Factors associated with PCC included pre-existing impairments, lower education, female gender, prior hospitalization, higher comorbidity, lower wealth, and mild COVID-19. A notable number of respondents, especially older individuals with fewer pre-existing health conditions, experienced PCC without awareness. Compared to an individual's pre-illness baseline and uninfected individuals, being positive for COVID-19 raised the risk of functional limitation, depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairment. Additionally, addressing PCC through both subjective and objective approaches is essential to alleviate individual and societal burdens.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19DepressionAffectAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetirementRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39693300
PMCPMC11654941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.