Trial reportPloS one2024
Innovative population-based strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A 2-year randomised control trial evaluating behavioral change led by community champions versus brief advice.
Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community based interventions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women living in rural, regional and remote areas: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Translating lifestyle interventions for optimal brain health in Africa.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) caused 17.9 million deaths worldwide in 2019. General CVD prevention should be developed whilst controlling health expenditure. The aim of the SPICES project was to assess the efficacy of a community support intervention for adults with intermediate CVD risk at 24 months, compared to repeated brief advice alone. A randomised, controlled study was conducted in a poor, medically underserved, rural area in France from November 2019 to November 2021. Community champions lead small group sessions. They were specifically trained in behavioural change techniques and CVD prevention. Participants chose their own small, feasible cardiovascular health goals. The primary outcome was the difference in the Non-laboratory Interheart risk score (INL) in intention-to-treat at 24 months. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF, diet using the DASH-questionnaire, physical activity using the IPAQ-short. Changes in BMI, smoking level, and self-declared alcohol consumption were recorded as health goals in the intervention group.1309 participants were eligible. 536 people were analysed. At 24 months, the difference Intervention-Control = -0.12 INL (95% CI -0.80 to 1.04) was not significant (p = 0.76). 257 people remained in the study. Most participants chose weight-loss as their objective. Although this study was impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, pertinent observations were made. Participants spontaneously chose to lose weight, which was not an effective goal. The study was neglected by participants which suggests this population felt little concerned about CVD-prevention. Other awareness strategies should be developed. Public policies should be developed as individuals currently fail to improve their health. Trial registration: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT0388606).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.