ReviewThe American journal of case reports2024
Giant Duodenal Brunneroma: Report of a Rare Case and Review of the Literature.
Review in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brunneromas are among the rarest benign tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. They arise from the Brunner's glands and patients have a good prognosis if treated timely and radically. Because symptoms are rare, their diagnosis can be challenging, especially regarding the smaller ones. The symptoms reflect a vast spectrum, from asymptomatic to severe obstructive symptoms and bleeding. Given the elevated clinical suspicion, it is imperative to accurately diagnose these tumors. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 39-year-old male patient with a giant Brunneroma in the second segment of the duodenum. He was admitted to the hospital due to melena, epigastric pain, and persisting anemia during the last 2 months preceding his admission. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a tumor in the second pars of the duodenum. Following an endoscopic examination and biopsy of the tumor, the case was presented to the multidisciplinary team (MDT) at our hospital. In accordance with the recommendation of the MDT, the patient underwent laparotomy and duodenum-preserving radical tumor excision, without any adverse incidents. The final histopathological reports and preoperative biopsies established the diagnosis of Brunneroma. CONCLUSIONS Because of their rarity and benign character, Brunneromas are often unsuspected and may not have surveillance protocols and proper treatment. This case report presents our experience and perspective regarding the most advisable approach, the differential diagnosis, treatment, and management of these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.